ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effects of scaling laws on flow and combustion characteristics of lean premixed swirl burners
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Turbomachinery, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, P.R. China
 
 
Submission date: 2022-05-23
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-10-27
 
 
Publication date: 2022-12-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Bing Ge   

Institute of Turbomachinery, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, P.R. China
 
 
J. Glob. Power Propuls. Soc. 2022;6:343-353
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Modern heavy gas turbine combustors are always huge, so it is difficult and costly to do experiment. Thus, geometry scaling method has come into sight. In this paper, based on a single lean premixed swirl burner, validated computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was used to study the effects of different scaling laws on various scalling models from 1/2 to 1/10. Experimental study on prototype combustor and the 3/5 scale model under full operating condition is also carried out to verify the NOx emission under different laws. Results showed that DaI scaling law was able to maintain good similarity under combustion state when scaling factor = 1/2–1/5, while Re scaling law would bring significant changes on flow and flame characteristics. The emission of NOx is also similar to prototype by using Dai law. But Re law could keep flow characteristics under non-combustion state. It is suggested that Dai law is suitable for lean premixed swirl combustor geometry scaling.
FUNDING
National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-V-0012-0064) in China.
COMPETING INTERESTS
Wenda Xie declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ting Shi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Bing Ge declares that he has no conflict of interest. Shusheng Zang declares that he has no conflict of interest.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Barroso G., Nussbaumer T., Ulrich M., Reiterer T., and Feldmeier S. (2020). Scale-up methodology for automatic biomass furnaces. Journal of the Energy Institute. 93 (2): 591--604. 10.1016/j.joei.2019.06.006
 
2.
Beér J. M. and Chigier N. A. (1972). Combustion Aerodynamics. New York: Reobert E.
 
3.
Cheng R. K., Yegian D. T., Miyasato M. M., Samuelsen G. S., Benson C. E., et al. (2000). Scaling and development of low-swirl burners for low-emission furnaces and boilers. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 28 (1): 1305–1313. 10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80344-6
 
4.
Damköhler G. (1937). Influence of diffusion, fluid flow, and heat transport on the yield in chemical reactors . Der Chemie Ingenieur. 3: 359–485.
 
5.
Hsieh T. A., Dahm W. J., and Driscoll J. F. (1998). Scaling laws for NOx emission performance of burners and furnaces from 30 kW to 12 MW. Combustion and Flame. 114 (1–2): 54–80. 10.1016/S0010-2180(97)00289-7
 
6.
Koupper C., Grech N., Zachos P., Pachidis V., and Singh R. (2012). Considerations on the Numerical Modelling and Performance of Axial Swirlers Under Relight Conditions.
 
7.
Meraner C., Li T., Ditaranto M., and Løvås T. (2020). Effects of scaling laws on the combustion and NO characteristics of hydrogen burners. Combustion and Flame. 214: 407–418. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.010
 
8.
Migliorini F., Maffi S., De Iuliis S., and Zizak G. (2014). Analysis of chemiluminescence measurements by grey-scale ICCD and colour digital cameras. Measurement Science & Technology. 25 (5): 55202. 10.1088/0957-0233/25/5/055202
 
9.
Moëll D., Lörstad D., and Bai X. (2016). Numerical investigation of methane/hydrogen/air partially premixed flames in the SGT-800 burner fitted to a combustion rig. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 96 (4): 987–1003. 10.1007/s10494-016-9726-5
 
10.
Popp M., Hulka J., Yang V., and Habiballah M. (2004). Liquid Rocket Thrust Chambers (Aspects of Modeling, Analysis, and Design) ||, Vol. 10.2514/4.866760.
 
11.
Smart J. P. and Kamp W. (1999). The impact of scaling criteria on the characteristics of pulverised coal flames. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing.
 
12.
Spalding D. B., Hottel H. C., Bragg S. L., Lefebvre A. H., Shepherd D. G., and Scurlock A. C. (1963). The art of partial modeling. In: Symposium (International) on Combustion. Elsevier , pp. 833–843.
 
13.
Szego G., Dally B., and Nathan G. (2008). Scaling of NOx emissions from a laboratory-scale mild combustion furnace. Combustion and Flame. 154 (1–2): 281–295. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.02.001
 
14.
Weber R. (1996). Scaling characteristics of aerodynamics, heat transfer, and pollutant emissions in industrial flames. In: Symposium (International) on Combustion. Elsevier, pp. 3343–3354.
 
15.
Weber R. and Breussin F. (1998). Scaling properties of swirling pulverized coal flames: From 180 kW to 50 MW thermal input. In: Symposium (International) on Combustion. Elsevier, pp. 2957–2964.
 
16.
Weber R. and Mancini M. (2020). On scaling and mathematical modelling of large scale industrial flames. Journal of the Energy Institute. 93 (1): 43–51. 10.1016/j.joei.2019.04.010
 
17.
Zhang Z., Liu X., Gong Y., Yang Y., Tang Z., et al. (2020). Experimental study of stratified swirl flame dynamics in a model gas turbine combustor. Energy. 211: 118699. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118699
 
eISSN:2515-3080
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top